Improved closeness (Luan et al. 2021) divides each hop distance by a power of the number of shortest paths, so that a partner reached along many shortest paths counts as closer: $$ICC(i) = \frac{n-1}{\sum_{j \ne i} d_{ij} / \sigma_{ij}^{\alpha}}.$$ Here \(d_{ij}\) is the hop distance and \(\sigma_{ij}\) the number of shortest paths between \(i\) and \(j\).
Arguments
- x
Network input accepted by
centrality.- icc_alpha
Exponent \(\alpha\) of the number of shortest paths, between 0 and 1. Default 0.2, one of the values studied by Luan et al. (2021).
- ...
Further arguments to
centrality, such asnormalized.
Details
The measure uses the simple undirected skeleton, so direction, weights,
loops and parallel edges are ignored, and mode has no effect.
With \(\alpha = 0\) the score on a connected network is the
normalized closeness,
and on a tree it does not depend on \(\alpha\). Scores can
exceed 1. On a disconnected network every node scores 0, because each
node has an unreachable partner at infinite distance. An isolated node
also scores 0. A value of icc_alpha outside 0 to 1 raises an
error.
References
Luan, Y., Bao, Z., & Zhang, H. (2021). Identifying Influential Spreaders in Complex Networks by Considering the Impact of the Number of Shortest Paths. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 34, 2168-2181. doi:10.1007/s11424-021-0111-7 .
