LineRank (Kang et al. 2011) computes PageRank on the line graph, whose nodes are the edges of the network, and gives each node the sum of the stationary probabilities of its incident edges. In a directed network edge \(e\) leads to edge \(f\) when the target of \(e\) is the source of \(f\). In an undirected network two edges are adjacent when they share an endpoint (Kosa et al. 2015).
Arguments
- x
Network input accepted by
centrality.- damping
Probability of continuing the walk on the line graph, in \([0, 1)\). Default 0.85.
- linerank_aggregation
"probability"(default) sums the stationary edge probabilities."weight"multiplies them by the edge weights first.- ...
Further arguments to
centrality. The measure usesweighted(use edge weights, defaultTRUE) andnormalized(divide by the maximum, defaultFALSE).
Details
The walk on the line graph moves to an adjacent edge with probability
proportional to that edge's weight and jumps to a uniformly chosen edge
with probability 1 - damping. An edge without successors also
jumps uniformly. With linerank_aggregation = "probability" the
scores sum to two on a network with edges. With "weight" each
stationary probability is multiplied by its edge weight before
aggregation, following the weighted incidence matrix of Algorithm 2 in
Kang et al. (2011). A loop contributes twice to its node, and an
isolated node scores zero. Edge weights must be finite and nonnegative,
and weighted = FALSE gives every edge weight one. A
damping outside \([0, 1)\) raises an error.
References
Kang, U., Papadimitriou, S., Sun, J., & Tong, H. (2011). Centralities in Large Networks: Algorithms and Observations. Proceedings of the 2011 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 119-130. doi:10.1137/1.9781611972818.11 .
Kosa, B., Balassi, M., Englert, P., & Kiss, A. (2015). Betweenness versus Linerank. Computer Science and Information Systems, 12(1), 33-48. doi:10.2298/CSIS141101092K .
