Computes the dispersion of a tie (Backstrom and Kleinberg 2014), a per-pair measure of tie strength. Edge weights are ignored, and directed networks use out-neighbors. For each pair \((u, v)\) where \(v\) is a neighbor of \(u\), the computation proceeds as follows.
Arguments
- x
Network input (matrix, igraph, network, cograph_network, tna object).
- u
Optional source node (1-based index or node name). If
NULL(default), compute for all sources.- v
Optional target node. If
NULL, compute for all neighbors ofu.- normalized
Logical. If
TRUE(default), return the normalized form; otherwise the raw count.- alpha
Numeric normalization exponent. Default 1.
- b
Numeric bias added to dispersion before exponentiation. Default 0.
- c
Numeric bias added to embeddedness in the denominator. Default 0.
Value
Scalar if both
uandvare specified.Named numeric vector if exactly one of
u,vis given, one element per neighbor of that node; the names are the neighbors' 1-based node indices as character strings.A data frame with columns
from,to,dispersionwhen neitherunorvis given, one row per ordered (node, neighbor) pair, withfromandtogiven as 1-based integer node indices.numeric(0)for an empty graph.
Details
Let \(S_T = N(u) \cap N(v)\) be their mutual friends (embeddedness).
Count pairs \((s, t) \subset S_T\) such that:
\(s\) and \(t\) are not directly connected, and
\(s\) and \(t\) share no common neighbor inside \(N(u)\) other than \(u\) and \(v\).
The raw dispersion is this count. When
normalized = TRUE, the result is \((\mathrm{dispersion} + b)^{\alpha} / (\mathrm{embeddedness} + c)\) (normalization is skipped whenembeddedness + c == 0).
References
Backstrom, L., & Kleinberg, J. (2014). Romantic partnerships and the dispersion of social ties: A network analysis of relationship status on Facebook. In Proceedings of CSCW (pp. 831-841). ACM. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.6753v1.pdf
